GoFactAI
← Blog
bc-tenancyproperty-managementcomplianceRTAnotice-periods

Can you still use last year's notice to end a BC tenancy?

A saved end-of-tenancy template is safe only if the period, the form, and the building limit match the notice being given now.

2026-10-13·3 min read
Use with AI
ShareXLinkedIn

A saved notice can still be beautifully written and still be the wrong document. In British Columbia, last year's end-of-tenancy template is safe to reuse only if the period, the form, and the building limit match the notice you are giving now.

Take a hypothetical instruction, not a reported case. An owner asks the firm to end the tenancy so a family member can move in. Someone opens the shared folder and finds a notice that worked in 2024. The purpose sounds the same. The period on the page may not be.

Policy Guideline 2A splits this by the date the tenant receives the notice. For landlord occupancy under section 49(3) or (4) of the Residential Tenancy Act, a notice received on or after June 18, 2025 is a three-month notice, with 21 days to dispute, and it must be generated as form RTB-32L. A notice received on or after July 18, 2024 but before June 18, 2025 was a four-month notice, with 30 days to dispute, also generated as RTB-32L. For purchaser occupancy under section 49(5), a notice received on or after August 21, 2024 is three months and 21 days, generated as RTB-32P. Regulation section 42.2 states the three-month period for sections 49(3), (4) and (5). Regulation section 42.3 states the 21-day dispute period. Regulation section 42.5 keeps the older periods for landlord-use notices given before June 18, 2025, and section 42.4 does the same for purchaser notices given before August 21, 2024. A template saved from that earlier window still has to match the period for the date the tenant will receive this notice. Warm wording does not update the table.

The form rule is separate from the period. Section 53.1 says a landlord must not give notice under a prescribed provision unless the notice is a generated notice, and must not change the information in that notice unless the director authorizes the change in writing or the regulations allow it. Regulation section 42.1 prescribes sections 49(3), (4), (5) and (6)(e) for that rule. Retyping an old RTB-32 into a fresh Word file does not generate the notice.

An early date does not throw the notice out. Section 53(2) deems an effective date that is too early to be the earliest date that complies with the section. That is a reason to calculate the date, not a reason to skip the generated form.

One building limit still catches firms that only check the form name. Section 49(6.1) says that, unless a regulation provides otherwise, a landlord must not give a notice for a purpose in subsection (3), (4) or (5) if the building has 5 or more rental units and is not strata-titled, or is strata-titled with all the rental units owned by the same owner. A correct form, sent for a purpose the building cannot use, is still the wrong notice.

The Monday check is mechanical. Read the purpose the owner actually asked for, landlord use or purchaser use, because the generated form differs: RTB-32L for landlord occupancy received now, RTB-32P for purchaser occupancy received on or after August 21, 2024. Count the units in the building before anyone talks about good faith. Then generate the notice. Retyping is the step that recreates last year's document.

Before anyone reuses a saved form, open the Guideline 2A table for the date the tenant will receive the notice: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/housing-and-tenancy/residential-tenancies/policy-guidelines/gl02a.pdf

See how this applies to your stack
20-minute discovery call - no pitch, just specifics.
Book a Call